We think that protecting and restoring local waterways – nature's water infrastructure – is the most efficient and equitable way to ensure the long-term quality of water and is the key to flood and climate resilient - and vibrant - Adirondack communities. In Ausable streams the effects of climate change have been evident and increasing for at least a couple decades. The goal for us is to restore self-sustaining streams that can manage flood flows and the shifts in sediment and structure caused by the increasingly intense storms that are the new norm in the Adirondacks and beyond.
Properly restored, streams and rivers maintain their form and function over time, building and rebuilding the riffles, pools, banks, and floodplains that are essential to ecosystems, wildlife, water quality, fisheries, communities, recreation, and public health. We've found that getting stream restoration right, restoring self-sustaining streams -- whether that is right-sizing culverts, ensuring streams have access to floodplains, protecting or replanting riparian buffers, or restoring stream channels -- requires patience, rigorous science, engaged landowners & communities, and a willingness to work at multiple scales.
Thinking Like a River
A stream is in equilibrium when slope and channel characteristics adjust themselves to create a velocity that will transport the water, sediment, and debris supplied by a watershed. A stable stream will neither aggrade nor degrade its channel, but will transport the flows and sediment coming from its watershed while maintaining channel dimension, pattern, and profile. When channel shaping variables change, whether by natural or human intervention, the stream will adjust its shape—meandering, adjusting its sinuosity or slope, or shifting its channel—to re-establish equilibrium. Channel shaping variables include water velocity, roughness of the bed, slope, width, depth, discharge, size of sediment and debris, and the amount of sediment.
The goal of stream restoration is to recreate a stable channel based on the hydrology and hydraulics that shape natural channels. This is commonly thought of as returning a stream to its natural, pre-disturbance condition. Frequently, however, the channel shaping variables have been modified by the land use changes that initiated the disequilibrium in the first place. It is therefore impossible to achieve a pristine condition. Instead, natural stream designs restore stability and habitat based on the potential of a stream and the present day realities of the communities and infrastructure surrounding it.
Left on their own and unimpeded by human intervention, most streams will restore their pattern, dimension, and profile in time. But that time might be 10, 50, or 100 years or more. In many natural or wilderness areas, such a time frame and the movement and changes of the river over land is acceptable. In areas where human use or management shape the landscape and limit the river's path, communities with resources at stake do not have time for the river to repair itself or the tolerance for its encroachment on their homes, roads, and businesses. That's where our natural restoration aproaches come into play. Designing to maximize a stream's potential, then implementing projects to achieve it, provides numerous benefits to the Ausable watershed and our local economy:
- Stable restored banks reduce sediment loads and bind phosphorous and other nutrients, limiting their release into waterways and their potential for downstream damage in storms.
- Since bare eroding banks are fertile ground for terrestrial invasive species, bank restoration and accompanying riparian restoration curb potential for invasives to gain a foothold.
- Fully restored streams with lush riparian buffers protect and shade aquatic habitats, cooling stream waters that are habitat for our native brook trout and the ecological diversity that is essential to our economy.
- Restoration methods that prioritize restoring stream morphology maximize a stream's potential to manage flood flows, reducing unpredictibility in storms and threats to human infrastructure.
*For more information on natural channel design, read David Rosgen's "Applied River Morphology," (1996) a technical handbook for stream restoration and Luna Leopold's eloquent "A View of the River" (1994). AsRA relies on the assessment standards detailed in A Funtion-Based Framework (Harman et al 2012) for identifying when and where to use natural channel design techniques. It is also an excellent techinical manual for understanding how streams work. Our stream restoration methodology is summarized here.